Objednávky oftalmologického materiálu:

Generated with Avocode.Group 2478Group 76Path 27Path 28Path 29Path 30 +420 725 426 104

Servis oftalmologických přístrojů:

Generated with Avocode.Group 2478Group 76Path 27Path 28Path 29Path 30 +420 720 991 853
Bi-Flex 677 M(Y) Liberty

Vizuální funkce a subjektivní vnímání vizu po bilaterální implantaci monofokální a multifokální IOL

Bi-Flex 677 M(Y) LibertyVizuální funkce a subjektivní vnímání vizu po bilaterální implantaci monofokální a multifokální IOL

Law EM, Aggarwal RK, Buckhurst H, Kasaby HE, Marsden J, Shum G, Buckhurst PJ

Purpose:

To examine monocular and binocular visual function and patient-reported outcomes after implantation of multifocal IOLs (mIOLs) or monofocal IOLs, using a rigorous series of clinical assessments.

Setting:

BMI Southend Hospital, United Kingdom.

Design:

Prospective, randomized, double-masked clinical trial.

Methods:

One hundred patients were randomized for bilateral implantation of either a Bi-Flex 677MY mIOL or a Bi-Flex 677AB IOL and were assessed at 3 to 6 months (V1) and 12 to 18 months (V2). Primary outcomes included distance, intermediate, and near logarithm of the minimum angle of resolution (logMAR) visual acuities (VAs) and defocus curve profile assessment. Secondary outcomes included reading speed, contrast sensitivity (CS), and the subjective perception of quality of vision.

Results:

Forty-seven subjects with monofocal IOL and 43 mIOL subjects completed the study. Uncorrected (mIOL: 0.10 ± 0.09 logMAR; IOL: 0.09 ± 0.11 logMAR) and corrected (mIOL: 0.04 ± 0.06 logMAR; IOL: 0.01 ± 0.07 logMAR) distance VAs were comparable (P > .05). Uncorrected near VA (mIOL: 0.23 ± 0.13 logMAR; IOL: 0.55 ± 0.20 logMAR, P < .001) and distance-corrected near VA (mIOL: 0.24 ± 0.13 logMAR; IOL: 0.54 ± 0.17 logMAR, P < .001) were significantly improved with mIOLs. There was no significant difference in distance-corrected intermediate VA (mIOL: 0.38 ± 0.13 logMAR; IOL: 0.39 ± 0.13 logMAR, P = .431). Defocus curves demonstrated an increased range-of-focus among mIOLs (mIOL: 4.14 ± 1.10 diopter [D]; IOL: 2.57 ± 0.77 D). Pelli-Robson CS was different at V1 (P < .001) but similar by V2 (P = .059). Overall satisfaction was high (>90%) in both groups for distance tasks whereas significantly different for near tasks (mIOL, 18.45 ± 16.53 logUnits; IOL, 55.59 ± 22.52 logUnits).

Conclusions:

Uncorrected near visual acuity was demonstrably better with mIOLs and there was greater subjective satisfaction with quality of near vision. Halos reported by the mIOL group were significant compared with the IOL group but did not show an adverse effect on overall satisfaction.

This randomized controlled trial comparing visual and subjective satisfaction with monofocal and multifocal IOLs demonstrated greater near vision and satisfaction with multifocal IOLs and equivocal distance acuity and satisfaction.